I guess McLaughlin is going back to his conservative roots. Well maybe not completely, cause he did chide the US republicans a bit by giving some coverage to a group of people in the UK who do not the monarchy and want it eliminated, calling themselves republicans.

For that particular issue, I'm with them. A monarchy is outdated in a democracy. Why the US national press is giving so much attention to that is beyond me. Our country is supposed to be more about the little guy - the opposite of a royal - being able to rise up through his hard work and ability to a level that is greater or equal to that of anyone born of privilege. Monarchy represents privilege strictly because of who you are. That's just not what most people think should be the most telling about someone. Most people think that you should be judged on your actions, not on your genetics. And I agree with most on that.

Pat Buchanan does have to get some points for truthfulness. He said, in defense of the monarch, that he was an "empire man." I totally believe him. I think he would be for some cruel despot - which is what is needed to build a true empire.

We need an empire built on peace and love. Maybe an old hippie should be the king or queen!